Ask for records, not opinions
FOI works best when you ask for held information: figures, dates, meeting minutes, policy papers, correspondence, guidance, logs, emails or decision documents.
LoanChargeFOI.co.uk is a dedicated public FOI platform created to help people ask focused Freedom of Information requests about the Loan Charge, HMRC conduct, Treasury decision-making and related public accountability issues.
A good FOI request is narrow, factual and answerable. The aim is not to argue the whole Loan Charge case in one message, but to obtain specific recorded information that can be used as evidence.
FOI works best when you ask for held information: figures, dates, meeting minutes, policy papers, correspondence, guidance, logs, emails or decision documents.
One clear request is usually better than a long list of demands. Broad requests are easier for a public authority to refuse on cost, burden or scope grounds.
Do not accuse, rant or speculate in the request itself. Strong campaigning points are often better made separately once the evidence has been obtained.
Before raising a new FOI, search the site for similar requests. This avoids duplication and helps LCAG build a cleaner evidence base.
Operational data, settlement figures, compliance activity, staff numbers, internal guidance, case-handling processes and figures relating to disguised remuneration work.
Policy decisions, ministerial submissions, Budget decisions, costings, fiscal rationale, settlement policy, advice to ministers and communications with HMRC on policy direction.
Cross-government coordination, propriety, central guidance, records involving No.10 or interdepartmental handling.
ICO for information-rights handling; IOPC for police-conduct-style referrals and oversight issues; OBR for fiscal assumptions, forecasts and published costings where held.
The best format is short: identify the information, define the date range, specify the breakdown you want, and ask for the information in a usable format.
Please provide the following recorded information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
For each tax year from 2016/17 to 2025/26, please provide:
1. The number of staff/FTE working primarily on Loan Charge or disguised remuneration compliance activity.
2. The estimated staff cost for that work.
3. The amount of tax, interest and penalties collected from individuals in relation to that work.
Please provide the information in spreadsheet or CSV format if held in that form.
If any part of this request is too broad, please provide advice and assistance under section 16 of FOIA and explain how the request could be narrowed.
If the authority appears to have misunderstood, reply calmly and identify the missing point. Do not turn the thread into a general argument.
If the authority refuses, withholds information, gives no meaningful answer or applies exemptions too broadly, ask for an internal review and explain why the response is inadequate.
Please treat this as a request for an internal review.
I do not consider that the response properly addresses the information requested. In particular:
1. [Explain the specific missing information.]
2. [Explain why the exemption or refusal appears too broad or unsupported.]
3. [Explain why the authority should hold the information or should have searched for it.]
Please review the handling of this request and provide any information that should have been disclosed.
How HMRC defines “brought into charge”, settlement totals, unresolved cases, open disguised remuneration cases and individual versus employer figures.
FTE, staff cost, external consultancy, litigation cost, recovery rates and collection performance over time.
Submissions, briefings, advice, assumptions, options analysis and risks presented to ministers.
Documents used by the Morse Review, McCann Review or HMRC/HMT in accepting, rejecting or limiting recommendations.
Information about large employers, small businesses, individuals, exclusions, settlement terms and write-offs.
Policies, guidance, risk assessments and escalation processes concerning vulnerable taxpayers and suicide-related cases.
Use the dedicated LoanChargeFOI platform for public-interest requests connected to the Loan Charge. Keep requests factual, narrow and evidence-led.